<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Open hardware</title>
	<atom:link href="http://openhardware.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://openhardware.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 20:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Prototype boards by George</title>
		<link>http://openhardware.wordpress.com/2007/10/03/prototype-boards-2/#comment-217</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 00:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openhardware.wordpress.com/2007/10/03/prototype-boards-2/#comment-217</guid>
		<description>I was wondering if the kernel provided drivers for USB audio. I have a project where I would like to take this design and load MP3 files onto the SD card and then connect USB speakers. Do you know if this will work or could I buy one of your prototypes from you to start my own testing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was wondering if the kernel provided drivers for USB audio. I have a project where I would like to take this design and load MP3 files onto the SD card and then connect USB speakers. Do you know if this will work or could I buy one of your prototypes from you to start my own testing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Linuxstamp motherboard by andrea</title>
		<link>http://openhardware.wordpress.com/2007/05/29/linuxstamp-motherboard/#comment-162</link>
		<dc:creator>andrea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 11:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openhardware.wordpress.com/2007/05/29/linuxstamp-motherboard/#comment-162</guid>
		<description>When will it be on sale? (and where)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When will it be on sale? (and where)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Linuxstamp motherboard by Brian</title>
		<link>http://openhardware.wordpress.com/2007/05/29/linuxstamp-motherboard/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 02:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openhardware.wordpress.com/2007/05/29/linuxstamp-motherboard/#comment-13</guid>
		<description>I have now read the specs on POE more thoroughly.  It looks like adding the detection resistor b/w the two pairs (25kohm) and possibly a 43V zener like the 568-3847-1-ND would allow us to get our 5V to enable the Regulator.  This would keep the Regulator in the 5-10uA off state during the detection stage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have now read the specs on POE more thoroughly.  It looks like adding the detection resistor b/w the two pairs (25kohm) and possibly a 43V zener like the 568-3847-1-ND would allow us to get our 5V to enable the Regulator.  This would keep the Regulator in the 5-10uA off state during the detection stage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Linuxstamp motherboard by openhardware</title>
		<link>http://openhardware.wordpress.com/2007/05/29/linuxstamp-motherboard/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>openhardware</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2007 20:45:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openhardware.wordpress.com/2007/05/29/linuxstamp-motherboard/#comment-12</guid>
		<description>I think that part would work well for the power supply.

The PSE (power sourcing equipment) tries to detect whether a device is POE or standard ethernet. Reading wikipedia it seems like this is done with a resistor. The problem is that the PSE is measuring the current at a specific voltage to read the resistance. I think the current draw of a normal power supply will change this reading. The power supply needs to be open until the PSE fully powers the lines. We could design something to do this or use an off the shelf POE part.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that part would work well for the power supply.</p>
<p>The PSE (power sourcing equipment) tries to detect whether a device is POE or standard ethernet. Reading wikipedia it seems like this is done with a resistor. The problem is that the PSE is measuring the current at a specific voltage to read the resistance. I think the current draw of a normal power supply will change this reading. The power supply needs to be open until the PSE fully powers the lines. We could design something to do this or use an off the shelf POE part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Linuxstamp motherboard by Brian</title>
		<link>http://openhardware.wordpress.com/2007/05/29/linuxstamp-motherboard/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2007 12:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openhardware.wordpress.com/2007/05/29/linuxstamp-motherboard/#comment-11</guid>
		<description>The LM2593HVS-5.0-ND is a 2A reg and has a /shutdown input.  What kind of detection/switching are you looking for?  If you want it to automatically detect a plug-in supply vs POE, you could have the 48VDC power a small SPDT relay that would let the plug-in supply run it in the NC position, and the POE would be connected to the NO position.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The LM2593HVS-5.0-ND is a 2A reg and has a /shutdown input.  What kind of detection/switching are you looking for?  If you want it to automatically detect a plug-in supply vs POE, you could have the 48VDC power a small SPDT relay that would let the plug-in supply run it in the NC position, and the POE would be connected to the NO position.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Linuxstamp motherboard by openhardware</title>
		<link>http://openhardware.wordpress.com/2007/05/29/linuxstamp-motherboard/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>openhardware</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2007 22:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openhardware.wordpress.com/2007/05/29/linuxstamp-motherboard/#comment-10</guid>
		<description>With the internal PLL I think it should be able to do the full 180 MHz. I am using the same frequency crystals as the Atmel design.

I hope to order prototypes any day now, but it might be a week or two. After we have tested the prototypes we will make a production run.

For the POE that is the type of part I would like to use. 500mA might not be enough power depending on what the mother board has on it. The POE spec says the voltage can go all the way to 60v (you might want some head room). Also there needs to be something for the detction process Liner has a part that does both the switching and dection, the LTC4267. The problem is that it is not as simple as the LM2597HVN-5.0-ND like you pointed out. If you come up with an elegant POE solution for the mother board we can include it in the design. Remember that the POE jack has the rectifiers built in so you have 48v DC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the internal PLL I think it should be able to do the full 180 MHz. I am using the same frequency crystals as the Atmel design.</p>
<p>I hope to order prototypes any day now, but it might be a week or two. After we have tested the prototypes we will make a production run.</p>
<p>For the POE that is the type of part I would like to use. 500mA might not be enough power depending on what the mother board has on it. The POE spec says the voltage can go all the way to 60v (you might want some head room). Also there needs to be something for the detction process Liner has a part that does both the switching and dection, the LTC4267. The problem is that it is not as simple as the LM2597HVN-5.0-ND like you pointed out. If you come up with an elegant POE solution for the mother board we can include it in the design. Remember that the POE jack has the rectifiers built in so you have 48v DC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Linuxstamp motherboard by Brian</title>
		<link>http://openhardware.wordpress.com/2007/05/29/linuxstamp-motherboard/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2007 21:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openhardware.wordpress.com/2007/05/29/linuxstamp-motherboard/#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Well it sounds like you've given it plenty of thought.

What speed will it run at?

Also I was wondering how far you are from a completed device, .
  
As for the POE, you could use a switching regulator like this digikey part (500mA, 5V): 
LM2597HVN-5.0-ND
They require a few smaller parts and three larger ones: one 68uF cap(60v) 100uf(5V) and a 100uH inductor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well it sounds like you&#8217;ve given it plenty of thought.</p>
<p>What speed will it run at?</p>
<p>Also I was wondering how far you are from a completed device, .</p>
<p>As for the POE, you could use a switching regulator like this digikey part (500mA, 5V):<br />
LM2597HVN-5.0-ND<br />
They require a few smaller parts and three larger ones: one 68uF cap(60v) 100uf(5V) and a 100uH inductor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Linuxstamp motherboard by openhardware</title>
		<link>http://openhardware.wordpress.com/2007/05/29/linuxstamp-motherboard/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>openhardware</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2007 00:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openhardware.wordpress.com/2007/05/29/linuxstamp-motherboard/#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Brian,

Thanks for your interest. I think for a second generation we might use gschem. I've tried it before, but I didn't find it as easy to use as Eagle. I used the Atmel reference design for much of the design. I changed some things like the power supply and the ethernet PHY. All of the decoupling capacitors are close to the pins, and both the power and ground nets are stars (there are no loops).

-Paul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian,</p>
<p>Thanks for your interest. I think for a second generation we might use gschem. I&#8217;ve tried it before, but I didn&#8217;t find it as easy to use as Eagle. I used the Atmel reference design for much of the design. I changed some things like the power supply and the ethernet PHY. All of the decoupling capacitors are close to the pins, and both the power and ground nets are stars (there are no loops).</p>
<p>-Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Linuxstamp motherboard by Brian</title>
		<link>http://openhardware.wordpress.com/2007/05/29/linuxstamp-motherboard/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 22:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openhardware.wordpress.com/2007/05/29/linuxstamp-motherboard/#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Your "LinuxStamp" idea is excellent.  I have been looking all over for a minimalist ARM based Linux board, preferably Atmel based (Their SoC are awesome). I was actually planning on designing one myself in gschem (to get 4 layers).

You said your design is 2 layers?  What frequency are you planning to run at?  You probably know a ground/power plane is helpful for noise suppression at higher frequencies (100-200MHz).  Also which docs are you using to design your board?   The Atmel app notes?

I have also been looking at Power over Ethernet designs.  Its too bad that the chips are on backorder at Digikey until mid august.

Anyway, awesome project.  I would like to help out if possible.

-Brian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your &#8220;LinuxStamp&#8221; idea is excellent.  I have been looking all over for a minimalist ARM based Linux board, preferably Atmel based (Their SoC are awesome). I was actually planning on designing one myself in gschem (to get 4 layers).</p>
<p>You said your design is 2 layers?  What frequency are you planning to run at?  You probably know a ground/power plane is helpful for noise suppression at higher frequencies (100-200MHz).  Also which docs are you using to design your board?   The Atmel app notes?</p>
<p>I have also been looking at Power over Ethernet designs.  Its too bad that the chips are on backorder at Digikey until mid august.</p>
<p>Anyway, awesome project.  I would like to help out if possible.</p>
<p>-Brian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Power Over Ethernet by 0blar</title>
		<link>http://openhardware.wordpress.com/2007/05/12/power-over-ethernet/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>0blar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 08:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openhardware.wordpress.com/2007/05/12/power-over-ethernet/#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your response
Where did you buy the PS-LTC3407-3 component ?
Regards</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your response<br />
Where did you buy the PS-LTC3407-3 component ?<br />
Regards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
